[Itpolicy-np] Utilization of the RTF Fund

[Kishor Panth]

My idea also is like having a strong team of people who can find out where to 
strike and get a heavy weight hammer and hit that. 

As it is like the manner you said under whose domain ?? the answer is that the 
body like NTA and MOIC should be clear in the job definition and there area 
of work. 

So in this as Pavan ji said let make a strong group that includes all the 
related sector and form a team who can carry the hammer and strike hard on 
the  point when necessary. 

Kishor



On Friday 09 February 2007 10:04, Pavan S Shakya wrote:
> "Hitting Hammer" where ?
>
> If at NTA, they will say MOIC ma kam hundaichha and its beyond our control.
> NTA is autonomous body and they cannot pressurize MOIC.
>
> If at MOIC, whom shall we meet ? Minister ? Secretary ? Joint Secretaries ?
> Under Secretaries ? Section Officers ?
>
> We definitely like to meet only Minister and Secretary so that things be
> processed on time. Not be made pancha barsiya yojana (five years' plan).
>
> Where is High Level Media Commission Recommendations ?
>
> Where is the OLD Telecomm Act which was designed very well ?
>
> Where is the RTDF recommendations ?
>
> If at HLCIT, ............... ? Do such issues fall under their domain ?
>
> If at Bikas Samiti, it might be another political decision but again the
> ball will be thrown in MOIC court.
>
> WHAT IS HAPPENING TO PC-TO-PC COMMUNICATION ? Who is studying the case --
> NTA or MOIC ?
>
> AND WE IN THIS FLOOR NEVER KNOW HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE ?
>
> MAKE A STRONG TEAM -- ISPAN is ready. ISPAN is ready to visit NTA or MOIC
> everyday and discuss the solutions and problems, unless and until we come
> to the conclusion.
>
> Is NTA ready to join the team ? Hummm....its a good question :)
>
> Who else is committed ?
>
> I PROPOSE TO FORM A PRESSURE GROUP which can "really" pressurize government
> on ICT development in Nepal.
>
> Pavan
>
> At 09:49 AM 2/9/2007, Kishor Panth wrote:
> >Yes I do agree with you Pavan ji  but the thing is that I think that we
> >are not able to hit on the point or we are not hitting that point. So now
> >I think with the support from the concern people who support our idea we
> >should make a strong team who can hit the hammer
> >
> >Kishor
> >
> >On Friday 09 February 2007 09:30, Pavan S Shakya wrote:
> > > We are fortunate that NTA has manager like Anand Sir who is ready to
> > > help us in our endeavour. However, the million dollar question asked
> > > and unasked is what alone can he do !! We all talk nicely when we meet
> > > and meet and meet but in reality, is it happening ?
> > >
> > > So, we all need to support him and we all know how Nepal's bureaucracy
> > > and political leaders listen to us. If necessary we need to take our
> > > issues out on the street and............
> > >
> > > Regarding RTDF :
> > >
> > > 1. If I remember correctly, RTDF Manual has been proposed to MOIC in
> > > late 2005 and so far nothing concrete has happened.
> > >
> > > 2. One of the recommendations they have is to create RTDF Management
> > > Committee.
> > >
> > > 3. I wonder if RTDF fund can be used as venture capital for rural
> > > telecomm development.
> > >
> > > 4. Such fund must be given back to the service providers who is ready
> > > to go to "real" remote places in Karnali or Mugu or Rolpa or
> > > Arghakhanchi, where they still do not have road access.
> > >
> > > 5. If a service provider wants to expand his services to any remote
> > > areas, such organisation must be exempted from paying 2% RTDF in order
> > > to motivate that organisation.
> > >
> > > 6. Such fund must be given to NGOs and CBOs who delivers results.
> > >
> > > I am sure we all have plenty of ideas to share on this floor.
> > >
> > > BUT WHAT IS THE RESULT IF GOVERNMENT IS NOT ACTING TIMELY.
> > >
> > > Pavan
> > >
> > > At 09:14 AM 2/9/2007, Kishor Panth wrote:
> > > >Hello all
> > > >As I have been observing we have been discussing about the RTF that is
> > > >there with NTA and I see every one saying that NTA is not utilizing
> > > > that fund. And we have been discussing on how the fund can be
> > > > utilized also but never came up with the concrete ideas on these
> > > > matter. Since Anand ji is there at NTA and is supporting our ideas on
> > > > using the fund I would like to request all the list members to come
> > > > up with the brilliant idea . So that we can provide some place where
> > > > the fund can be utilized.
> > > >
> > > >So let start floating the ideas, and since we have lot of peoples here
> > > >with the brilliant ideas.
> > > >
> > > >Lets keep the list hot  !!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > > >--
> > > >-........-
> > > >kishor at lahai dot com
> > > >+977-9851053824
> > > >-.........-
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Itpolicy-np mailing list
> > > >Itpolicy-np at lahai.com
> > > >https://lists.lahai.com/mailman/listinfo/itpolicy-np
> > >
> > > ---------
> > > Hami Nepali, Hamro Nepal, Jai hos Nepal !
> > > (we are Nepalese, its our Nepal, Hail to Nepal)
> > >
> > > Pavan S Shakya
> > > Director, Public Relations, WorldLink
> > > President, ISP Association of Nepal
> > >
> > > Email : pavan at wlink.com.np
> > > Phone : +977 1 5523050 Ext. 229
> > > Fax : +977 1 5529403
> > > H/P : +977 98510 27928
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Itpolicy-np mailing list
> > > Itpolicy-np at lahai.com
> > > https://lists.lahai.com/mailman/listinfo/itpolicy-np
> >
> >--
> >-........-
> >kishor at lahai dot com
> >+977-9851053824
> >-.........-
>
> ---------
> Hami Nepali, Hamro Nepal, Jai hos Nepal !
> (we are Nepalese, its our Nepal, Hail to Nepal)
>
> Pavan S Shakya
> Director, Public Relations, WorldLink
> President, ISP Association of Nepal
>
> Email : pavan at wlink.com.np
> Phone : +977 1 5523050 Ext. 229
> Fax : +977 1 5529403
> H/P : +977 98510 27928
>
> _______________________________________________
> Itpolicy-np mailing list
> Itpolicy-np at lahai.com
> https://lists.lahai.com/mailman/listinfo/itpolicy-np

-- 
-........-
kishor at lahai dot com
+977-9851053824
-.........-