[Itpolicy-np] I need consulation and support on Media server

enrd at wlink.com.np enrd at wlink.com.np
Fri Feb 2 17:22:53 GMT 2007 

Dear all,

I need one serious and urgent support and idea for our valued
professionals.

* I need to protect my MMS (Microsoft Media Service) and RTSP (Real Time
streaming Protocol) stream.

I want to setup firewall or any security in my Windows Media Server 2003
where my video streams are located. Only authenticated request from our
web-domain should access the media streams.

Please advise any solution to descard the request from any other sources
then from authenciated defined users from web-domain interface.

Note: Format of the media stream is MMS://IP address/header

Reagards
Rajendra

On 1/28/2007, "Prasanna David G" <prasannadavid at gmail.com> wrote:

>Apologies for my ignorance and asking stupid questions, but what is
>the composition of HLCIT ?  How do they get input ?
>
>If the Govt. is reciving huge loans for building up ICT
>infrastructure, how does the Govt. decides what is going to be done
>and how ?  Whom does it consult ?  HLCIT or NTC or someone else ?
>
>We cannot depend on Telco's alone for building the communication
>infrastructure.  Most of the time, telcos like to have the ability to
>"limit and control" flow of information so that it is easier to
>charge, and hence would prefer the likes of CDMA to WiFi.
>
>Mahabir ji has shown the way how best to do it for this country, but
>how exactly can we make the Govt. adopt that model ?  Do we influence
>the government through the ever changing ministers or through the
>likes of HLCIT ?
>
>Another question, when the likes of ADB gives huge loans for
>infrastructure development, do they tell us what and how to do ?
>
>
>I agree with Pavan ji that we should not copy from other countries,
>also because our governance, geography, etc are all different.  Also,
>when other developed countries started move in this direction, the
>technologies, products and wisdom that was available was very
>different from what we have today.
>
>regards,
>Prasanna David
>
>
>On 1/27/07, pavan at wlink.com.np <pavan at wlink.com.np> wrote:
>> Sad but true that our Government is lagging behind than our neighbours.
>> When I recall my visit to India back in 1989, only few top government
>> offices were equipped with XT computers while, THEN, I had the
>> opportunity to learn Word Star 2.0 being a school chap.
>>
>> Shall we analyze where did we go wrong and learn from our mistakes and
>> failures ?
>>
>> During the first interaction session of e-governance, in NITC, I had
>> asked the floor that :
>>
>> ARE WE TARGETTING 80% RURAL POPULATION OR 20% URBAN POPULATION ?
>>
>> If ADB is providing grant/loan/subsidy to the government, let's work
>> together in PPP model. Let us all work out on plans that suits our
>> country and not just copy the model of developed country.
>>
>> OTHERWISE, WE WILL BE ADDING ANOTHER CONCRETE WALL TO HIDE DIGITAL DIVIDE.
>>
>> Pavan
>>
>> On 1/27/2007, "mahabir at himanchal.org" <mahabir at himanchal.org> wrote:
>>
>> >Hello All;
>> >
>> >Sorry I forgot to paste the link. It is here.
>> >
>> >http://mit.gov.in/csc/MediaBrief.asp
>> >
>> >Mahabir
>> >
>> >> Hello all;
>> >>
>> >> Please look at the news clip as what Indian government is doing. They are
>> >> talking about setting up 100,000 rural community service centers across
>> >> the country for their e-governance plan. Let us not just look at the news
>> >> clip but think.
>> >>
>> >> I have heard that Mr. Kim from Korea is in Kathmandu with 30 million
>> >> dollar support from Korean government. There is contribution from ABD or
>> >> World Bank also. Do you think the e-governance plan that Mr. Kim is
>> >> working on with HLCIT will succeed without building a reliable wireless
>> >> broadband network infrastructure accross the country?
>> >>
>> >> Setting up wireless broadband network across the country is setting up
>> >> information highway in Nepal. It is the duty of Nepal Government to set it
>> >> up or at least take initiative to set it up. After the information highway
>> >> is built up, it is the work of DDCs, VDCs, schools/colleges, private
>> >> businesses and development agencies to expand the network to every corner
>> >> of the country. In other word, once the information highway is built up,
>> >> people will take initiative to bring the ICT to their homes and
>> >> businesses. and will use it the way they would like. The innovativeness
>> >> that Gaurab has mentioned comes after that.
>> >>
>> >> Take an example of many rural roads that VDCs, DDCs, and INGOs have built
>> >> deep into the rural areas adjoining the major highways. They are still
>> >> building the many more roads. If you have not been out of Kathmandu valley
>> >> for quite a long time, please learn that there are many rural roads that
>> >> go to different villages from Prithvi Highway, East West Highway,
>> >> Siddhartha Highway, Arniko Highway etc.
>> >>
>> >> Let us think and work together.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Mahabir
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> I agree with Mahabir dai here. Believing that CDMA will bring in more
>> >>> options is good - but it doesn't give the local users to be
>> >>> innovative and build using newer and more adaptive technologies.
>> >>> Moreover, this brings in 'vendor lock-in' in the form of Nepal
>> >>> Telecom - not very good for the consumers.
>> >>>
>> >>> And, CDMA won't be able to provide the necessary bandwidth, and VSAT
>> >>> are too expensive. NT/other operators can continue to deploy CDMA and
>> >>> other forms of access, but that shouldn't rule out anyone else
>> >>> providing innovative service. RTDF usage shouldn't be tied to certain
>> >>> technologies. For that matter, any kind of policy tied to any
>> >>> specific technology is a bad idea - it hinders innovation.
>> >>>
>> >>> and i guess we have already seen this with the nepal wireless
>> >>> project, but not for the policies but for the way mahabir worked.
>> >>>
>> >>> thanks
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jan 26, 2007, at 4:27 AM, mahabir at himanchal.org wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hello  all;
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It is nice to read the recommendations that PS-4 study made. Thank you
>> >>>> Gajendra ji for that. Please comment on my ideas if I am wrong.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> There is no doubt that CDMA will cover a large area of Nepal and will
>> >>>> provide telephone and Internet servise to the people in the rural
>> >>>> areas.
>> >>>> However, CDMA has bandwidth constraint and the 153 kbps Internet
>> >>>> connection is good for browsing only the Internet and send emails.
>> >>>> However, it is not enough for delivering telemedicine and teleteaching
>> >>>> requirements of the rural areas. Telemedicine and teleteaching are the
>> >>>> needs of the rural areas where no doctors and qualified teachers are
>> >>>> available.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> My strong point is that wireless is the only way to bring the medical
>> >>>> doctors living and working in the city hospitals virtually to the
>> >>>> villages. There is no way anybody can force them to go and work in the
>> >>>> remote areas. If we find ways to connect them to the villages through
>> >>>> wireless, there will be many doctors available to serve the rural
>> >>>> areas
>> >>>> people. The same is true with qualified teachers that are needed in
>> >>>> the
>> >>>> rural schools.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Fiber optics is the best solution to provide the high bandwith
>> >>>> connectivity for telemedicine and teleteaching purpose. However, it
>> >>>> will
>> >>>> not be practical in the Mahabharat and Himalayan region. VSAT is the
>> >>>> easiest solutions, but who can afford the US$3 per kbps bandwidth
>> >>>> charge?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Therefore Wireless network is the best solution to meet the needs that
>> >>>> CDMA can't not provide.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Here is one idea. Nepal is about 1,400 km long from East to West.
>> >>>> If we
>> >>>> build relay towers at about a distance of 30 km apart, we will need to
>> >>>> build about 45 relay towers. These towers should be built on the
>> >>>> mountain
>> >>>> ranges right after the Terai belt from where it can cover maximum
>> >>>> areas to
>> >>>> the North and to the South. From those towers, we need to build
>> >>>> towers to
>> >>>> the North at about the same distance. The average distance from
>> >>>> South to
>> >>>> North of Nepal is about 100 KM. That means we need to build three
>> >>>> towers
>> >>>> to cover North to South. That will make about 150 towers in total.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Now NTC has already built many towers across the country. If we use
>> >>>> their
>> >>>> towers, we won't need to build more than 150 relay towers. Each tower
>> >>>> should be equipped with  four to six radios that has 100Mbps to 150
>> >>>> Mbps
>> >>>> transmit power. These radios are available now in the market.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If we use radios that have over 50 km to 100 km ranges in near line of
>> >>>> sight (NLOS) situation, we won't even need to build 150 towers
>> >>>> across the
>> >>>> country.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Now comes the VSAT. We can use VSAT in the areas where none of the
>> >>>> technology as mentioned above can reach. Therefore we don't need to
>> >>>> build
>> >>>> 1,700 VSAT stations that the PS - 4 study has recomended.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The truth is that it will take less than three years to get everything
>> >>>> done. It is not that a hard task to do.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Mahabir Pun
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Dear Mahabirji   Khanalji and friends of the discussion group,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> May be  I can share outcomes of  PS-4  study (I
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Itpolicy-np mailing list
>> >Itpolicy-np at lahai.com
>> >https://lists.lahai.com/mailman/listinfo/itpolicy-np
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Itpolicy-np mailing list
>> Itpolicy-np at lahai.com
>> https://lists.lahai.com/mailman/listinfo/itpolicy-np
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Itpolicy-np mailing list
>Itpolicy-np at lahai.com
>https://lists.lahai.com/mailman/listinfo/itpolicy-np
>
>

More information about the Itpolicy-np mailing list